Argumentative Essays on Death Penalty,Pros and Cons of Death Penalty
WebThe death penalty has been a method used as far back as the Eighteenth century B.C. The use of the death penalty was for punishing people for committing relentless crimes. The WebThe death penalty is the act of executing somebody as discipline for particular wrongdoing after an appropriate lawful preliminary. It is a definitive discipline. There is no harsher WebThe death penalty is the wrong consequence more many reasons. Although, individuals are rarely put to death for crimes they did not commit, it does happen. To avoid wrongfully WebFeb 7, · The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, WebNov 26, · Death penalty is globally known as capital punishment or the highest form of punishment that the government can sanction against a persecuted person to be ... read more
Individuals should never lose their respect for human dignity. Good or bad actions, all humans have emotions and can feel pain; at somewhat the same level. Individuals who do not agree with the principle of human dignity are in support of the death penalty. There are many factors that morality support the death penalty. Supports are in favor of taking the life of someone who committed a horrendous crime; a life for a life. Individuals who do not agree with the human dignity argument may attempt to argue that the death penalty is an effective consequence because it deters other criminals from committing the crimes. Continuing, it may be argued that the death penalty can show society its moral outrage at unpleasant crimes. Resulting in a decrease in the crime rates.
Although this seems efficient, an individual who commits a crime already knowing the consequences. Life in prison with no possible chance of parole is enough to deter an individual of a crime who does not want to seek punishment. Other supporters of the death penalty derive more from government than society. The government is considerably more in favor of the death penalty because of the costs. This argument is important to the government because it saves the government more money. Morally, this is the most incorrect argument regarding the death penalty. No amount of money is equivalent to the life of a human being. The death penalty is the wrong consequence more many reasons. Although, individuals are rarely put to death for crimes they did not commit, it does happen.
To avoid wrongfully killing an individual for a crime they did not commit, the death penalty should not be used a punishment. Technology continues to advance every day. Scientist are figuring out new technology and experiments as we speak. If new advances in technology regarding the criminal justice system were to be discovered and the death penalty was not implemented, an individual would gain their rights and freedom back. A wrongfully committed individual can be released from prison, not brought back to life. Not all, but some crimes can be justified.
The death penalty is such a controversial topic there will never be a correct answer. The arguments are all based on morals and views. Although there is no correct answer, there is a better answer. The human dignity argument gives all humans, equal rights; regardless is one made a criminal mistake or not. All humans have human dignity. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. According to Berman there were several officials begging for them to change the pace of executions because it imposes stress and trauma Berman. This proves that carrying out several executions can take a severe toll on correction officers wellbeing. This proves that when working as a correction officer and you have to execute people it can be very traumatic and hard to get over which causes stress.
Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it is extremely expensive. This proves that the states are spending billions of dollars just to execute people when that money could be going towards something more beneficial. This proves that the cost of housing just one single death row inmate is very expensive. If housing just one is millions of dollars, than imagine how much money it is when housing multiple. This shows that capital cases cost a lot of money and is very expensive. It cost way more than it would cost if it was just life without parole. Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it kills innocent people.
This quote proves that over people has been put on death that are innocent. According to Holloway there was this man name Henry McCollum, who was in prison for 30 years on death row for the murder of an 11 year old girl which evidence showed that he did not do. For instance, in Indiana, out of the 21 inmates who have been sentenced to death, 17 of them are both Hispanics and Blacks Isikoff, It is argued that this is one of the highest percentages of death rows at the state level. Furthermore, during the Clinton era, out of the death penalty cases that were approved, more than three quarters were against minority defendants Isikoff, Besides, President Clinton also signed an antiterrorism bill that comprised of a measure that restricted the ability of inmates on state death-row to produce new evidence.
For instance, it is argued that for the society to function effectively, people have to be controlled such that they cannot commit anarchy at will. In addition, there are high chances that murder convicts are likely to commit the same crime in future. As such, such a person who commits murder by extension has shown that he or she does not respect his or her own right to life. Therefore death penalty should not be viewed from a perspective of revenging for the dead it should be viewed from a closure perspective where such a situation is not welcomed again. In addition to that, it should not be viewed from the fairness perspective rather it should be approached from a perspective that we are preventing any future occurrence of a similar event. With this in mind, while in the jail, the felon requires to be supplied with the basic necessities for instance food, clothing among many others for which the government is under an obligation to provide.
It is worth considering that the government does not give these necessities to the inmate for free. The government have to get the money from the taxpayers so that they can be in a position to provide the basic necessities Cromie, Viewing it from another angle it would be right to say that we are taxed by the government so highly so that the felons who killed our loved ones can be well maintained. It simply sounds as an abuse to the ears of families of such death victims since this is absolutely wrong and this should not happen. Another school of thought is of the opinion that death penalty simply an institutionalised revenge. This is because the justice system turns death penalty to what it is initially meant to be that is a controlled force mechanism with the aim of violence elimination.
Unfortunately what the justice system does is that it becomes by itself the system of violence by excising death penalty Scherer, Apparently, rather than enabling the society to move from the culture of eye to eye kind of justice, we find that through death penalty it is actually encouraged. In conclusion, it is evident that a time for societal change has come where death penalties are no more. In the paper, an evaluation has been done where both argument for and against has been evaluated and a position that is firmly guided by reasons and fact have been obtained. With all said and done a time for abolishing death penalty has come since they have no advantage that can be attached to it.
Cromie, J. The death penalty. Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press. Scherer, L. Isikoff, M. Race, Death, and the Feds. Capital Punishment, Resource Counsel Project. Berry, W. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. Note: this sample is kindly provided by a student like you, use it only as a guidance. ID Password recovery email has been sent to email email. Don't waste time. I agree. HIRE A WRITER Sign in. World of Writing Hub Blog Free Essay Writing Tools Quizzes and Tests Essay Topics Types of Essays Free Essay Examples. Who We Are Contact Us Our Writers Our Guarantees FAQ Honor Code WowEssays Reviews Our Services.
ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS. Death penalty The death penalty, or capital punishment as it is commonly known, is one of the issues that have raised controversy not only in the United States, but all over the globe. References Cromie, J. Cite this page Choose cite format: APA MLA Harvard Vancouver Chicago ASA IEEE AMA. Accessed 07 February Example Of Death Penalty Essay. March Accessed February 07, Retrieved February 07, com, Mar Free Essay Examples - WowEssays. Published Mar 25, Share with friends using:. Removal Request. REQUEST THE REMOVAL. Finished papers: This paper is created by writer with ID If you want your paper to be: Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate Original, fresh, based on current data Eloquently written and immaculately formatted.
Hire this Writer. Calculate Price. Subject arear Accounting Biology Business Chemistry Computer Science Economics Engineering Finance Financial Management Geography Geology Logic Mathematics Medicine Nutrition Pharmacology Physics Science Statistics Technology. Academic level High school Undergraduate Bachelor Professional. Deadline 3 hours 6 hours 12 hours 24 hours 2 days 3 days 7 days 14 days 20 days. order now. Submit Your Paper. Related Topics Upper Saddle River Essay SHOW All.
Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Death Penalty — The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons. The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty-one states in which the death penalty is legal and nineteen states that have abolished it. I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. There are many reasons as to why I think the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, retribution, and morality; and because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will refute the ideas that the death penalty is unconstitutional, irrevocable mistakes are made, and that there is a disproportionality of race and income level.
The use of capital punishment greatly deters citizens from committing crimes such as murder. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts…. Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence. This was due to other possible murderers being deterred from committing murder after realizing that other criminals are executed for their crimes. Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again.
Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty. The reason some evidence may be inconclusive is that the death penalty often takes a while to be carried out; some prisoners sit on death row for years before being executed. This can influence the effectiveness of deterrence because punishments that are carried out swiftly are better examples to others. Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible criminals, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried out more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years. The death penalty also carries out retribution justly.
When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society. Giving the death penalty as a punishment simply restores order to society and adequately punishes the criminal for his wrongdoing. Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families. The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal. The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years.
Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance. It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US. Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer.
Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible. The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form. After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid. Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral. The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.
It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly. Pros and Cons of Death Penalty Twenty-nine states in the United States have legalized the death penalty. That means that twenty-one of our states are smart enough to keep it banned for the sense of our society now-a-days. Statistically, there has been over fifteen thousand killings with the death penalty since it has been originated. No one wants to be sent to death row; it is by far the most cruel and inhuman punishment anyone could ever receive. In this world, there are eight different types of execution still being used. The United States being able to use three of these methods: Lethal injection, Electrocution, and Gas inhalation.
Other Countries around the world still use the processes of Hanging, Shooting, Beheading, Stoning, and Crucifixion. Most of these areas have some kind of legal government utilizing which methods to use, if multiple is available. Hanging was abandoned in the United States when a hanging went in the wrong direction and instead of the spinal cord being severed, it was either a decapitation or slowly strangling to death. Most of which had their own problems as well, but still being more reliable. Approximately 2 percent of them were botched, some of them when the condemned caught on fire and filled the death chamber with smoke and the smell of burning flesh. The gas chamber, first used in , proved to be even less reliable.
More than 5 percent of executions in the gas chamber were botched when the gas did not produce rapid loss of consciousness and witnesses watched as the condemned suffered an agonizingly slow asphyxiation. We also considered that the average age for men and women are both around seventy-four to seventy-eight years of life. We have a lot more people who think about what they do and decide they want to live over dying any day. As a reaction to capital punishment, there are families out there who suffer from losses of children, loved ones, and family members. Not letting those who are on death row have an equal trial is in violation of amendment 14 and 6 of the Constitution.
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Amendment 6 states, in brief words, that everyone is guaranteed a fair trial before sentencing or coming up with a solution. It is wrong and unfair, not to mention the most unusual and cruel punishment that the world has ever had. In the opinion of most people, capital punishment should be legal because someone people just deserve to die from doing morbidly horrific things. Me as a human with choices, I decided to be on that lower sided percentage and refuse to let people just murder anyone they want on death row, whether innocent or not.
This phrase should mean in all criminal cases that someone objected to law deserves and receives a trial to be proven guilty or innocent. In a final look at this argument between right and wrong, it seems to be capital punishment is also a way to keep population at good standards. So many people being on death row every year are killed and left behind which cuts the population down and makes it easier for the new and upcoming generations to change things. While most adults on death row are between 20 to 50, give or take few in different locations. Capital punishment cannot be administered to meet these conditions. Another side would be that lethal injection is used most because it has been said to be the easiest and less painful way to kill a criminal.
That being known it is used the most on people but there has recently been killings that are interrupted because the dosage was gave to them wrong or it was the wrong medicine, making it a not-so-easy way of killing these people and making it an aggressive or slow way to die. In conclusion, Capital Punishment is wrong. Everyone deserves to have a fair trial whether innocent or guilty. If only one person tries to help an innocent criminal on death row, it could take up to fifteen years just for them to get everyone else to switch sides.
No one deserves to be thrown into death row without a fair trial and someone actually helping them. No one deserves to be killed. Everyone has a path and it never ends on death row. Spelling, punctation, and grammar are accurate. Well done! A few things to bear in mind for future development: Personal pronouns are not normally used in academic writing. The introduction should begin with Show more Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Starting from 3 hours delivery. Keywords: Capital punishment,Prison,Lethal injection,Crime,Murder,Death penalty Should the death penalty be abolished? Essay on this question can be quite controversial, no matter what side of the argument is chosen.
But [ The "death penalty" should never exist in the first place. The "death penalty" is wrong.. It should not be given to anybody, whether they are under the age of 18 or not. It is morally wrong and will be the doom of America, The [ Capital punishment is can divided into different types, such as: electric [ Death penalties, also known as capital punishments, are a type of punishment that have been used throughout history to ensure the prevention of further attempted crimes from the convicted criminals. This type of punishment is [ There is no avoiding the attention fixated on crime in South Africa currently.
The death penalty is used in 53 countries including China and 31 states within the USA to punish capital offenses. The death penalty was abolished in Britain in , but there has been much debate over if it should be [ There are millions of guns throughout the United States. People obviously have different views on how one should properly use and gun and why. Unfortunately, it seems that these guns very often fall into the wrong hands and [ We will occasionally send you account related emails.
For and Against Death Penalty Essay,Related topic
WebFeb 7, · The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, WebNov 26, · Death penalty is globally known as capital punishment or the highest form of punishment that the government can sanction against a persecuted person to be WebCurrently the United States will only use the death penalty, if one commits first-degree murder. Individuals that believe in the death penalty believe that capital punishment will WebThe death penalty has been used for years as a way to punish the guilty. The death penalty used to be an effective way of reducing crime. Over the years the death penalty WebThe death penalty is the wrong consequence more many reasons. Although, individuals are rarely put to death for crimes they did not commit, it does happen. To avoid wrongfully WebThe death penalty has been a method used as far back as the Eighteenth century B.C. The use of the death penalty was for punishing people for committing relentless crimes. The ... read more
In civil cases, most of the verdict comprises of jail time or fine amount to be paid. This phrase should mean in all criminal cases that someone objected to law deserves and receives a trial to be proven guilty or innocent. Death penalty laws are present in the legislation of nations as different as China, India, Nigeria, Egypt, Taiwan, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, and several others. This type of punishment is [ If you need this sample, insert an email and we'll deliver it to you.
This case proves that some death row cases are unfair and they convict innocent people. Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again. The death essay about death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. It is a right that not even law should take away, essay about death penalty. This is why a continuously increasing number of law professionals are seriously questioning the effectiveness of the penalty in preventing crime. Throughout the years following the first execution, criminal behaviors have begun to deteriorate. I believe the death penalty is a form of evil that cannot be justified or reasoned in any way by taking the life of a person.
No comments:
Post a Comment